You will feel surprised at how closely Pro Evo replicates the actual game in terms of gait, pace, ball control and finishing power. Sometimes, you almost feel like you can see the personalities of the players based on their playing styles.
There are also player interactions among each other that help to make the collaboration and game feel more realistic. It could be the smart controls or the way the ball physics feel. What Pro Evo Gets Right: Hard to Pinpointīecause Pro Evo has made so many tiny improvements to the game, it can sometimes be difficult deciding what they got right.
Nevertheless, all this stuff will fade into the background after things go right with the pitch. It can be somewhat depressing hearing that the open field is wide open when you are being harried almost mercilessly. Other times, the commentary in PES 2016 fails to respond at all. With other sides, however, it can feel unconvincing, and it will not take you many matches before you realize that there is somewhat generic and repetitive commentary. For example, the commentary from Jim Beglin and Peter Drury are almost adequate when you look at the licensed Champions League teams on the pitch. While Pro Evo has started to gain some momentum in delivering a match that has a more realistic atmosphere, it still lags behind FIFA in some areas. It depends on what you are looking for in your football game. It's a close tie, but you have to take the claims that PES 2016 stomps FIFA this year with a grain of salt. In fact, the ball animation and ball physics cannot be beaten by FIFA 16.
FIFA 16 DEMO DOWNLOAD KICKASS SKIN
With that in mind, the cloth dynamics and players' skin has never looked better in a PES game, which is definitely one aspect that has moved forward. Those who are overly critical might complain about the grass looking too flat or the effects of the footfalls on wet turf being too unconvincing. This has given Pro Evo a better edge than its rival. With that in mind, you have superior detail, more fluid animation and better lighting. This year's PES has chosen to use the same FOX engine that could be found in Metal Gear Solid 5. When it comes to the graphics, however, PES 2016 pales in comparison to FIFA. If you think quickly, you will be rewarded, and if you play clumsy, it will be punished. In fact, it does a better job at comparing and capturing the actual flow of the game. With that in mind, should you choose PES 2016 or FIFA 16? With the utmost certainty, Konami's latest football game plays faster paced than the EA rival FIFA 16.
FIFA creates a more accurate depiction of the sport while Pro Evo does a better job at capturing the feel of the game. In general, it can always be iffy comparing this to FIFA because the two games handle in distinctively different ways. With the arrival of the 2016 game, PES has changed what remained of the PS2-era gaming, and they have delivered a much faster and more fluid game of football. Instead of big improvements, PES 2016 is the type of game that has been improved in dozens of small ways, and they have all had an accumulative and positive effect. Explaining the improvements in PES 2016 can be somewhat of a challenge because the improvements do not lend themselves to something snappy, and it can be difficult to point to a single change that was made that will make a difference.
0 kommentar(er)
